What kind of ‘change’ is McCain talking about?

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

Nelson Graves
Published: September 17, 2008

Was I watching and hearing the Republican candidate for U.S. president on television during his convention acceptance speech, John S. McCain or Democratic candidate Barack H. Obama? Throughout and especially at the end of his speech, McCain exhorted the Republican delegates to – paraphrasing here – “Stand up! Stand up! Stand up!” for change and take back America.
For more than a year and a half, Obama has been advocating the same idea and many conservatives, particularly Republicans, have asked Obama what he means by “change.”
Now that John McCain is promising to “change America” and put it back on track, do conservatives who questioned Obama when he spoke about “change” now know what he meant? Or is McCain’s change is different than Obama’s?
If American voters who questioned Obama’s change suddenly know what change is, it tells me they were just looking for a reason to oppose his candidacy. Not wanting to admit that they couldn’t overcome the color of his skin, they looked for reasons that obscured their embedded racism.
Both candidates are in agreement on certain “changes.” They want to improve the lives of average Americans by jump-starting America’s economy. Both advocate creating and keeping good paying jobs within our borders. Both say that with American ingenuity and inventiveness we can create alternative sources of energy, provide quality education for all American students and health care for all Americans. Both also vow to return America’s standing in the world to where it used to be. Today, we aren’t too well thought of. Finally, both want to return civility to Congress.
Make no mistake there are differences between McCain and Obama.
McCain wants to keep Bush’s tax breaks for the upper class (rich) and corporations in place, keep U.S. troops in Iraq indefinitely (think South Korea), drill for more oil in continental U.S. locations and offshore.
Obama wants to reverse tax cuts for the upper class and extend them to middle-class families, reduce troop levels in Iraq responsibly and transfer our forces to Afghanistan, (where they should’ve been anyway) and provide all Americans with basic health care coverage. To pay for health care, Obama would increase corporate taxes.
I watched an excerpt of Republican vice presidential candidate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson. Gibson asked her if she had a moment’s doubt if she were ready to be president should the need arise. She not only said that she was ready, but amazingly didn’t hesitate to make or doubt her own assertion.
More amazingly, Republican supporters agree with her.
Since the Republican convention McCain and Obama have been distracted by Palin’s entry into the presidential race. Hopefully, both McCain and Obama will return to telling voters their plans to restore middle class American values and opportunities.
I don’t believe a McCain-Palin administration will be any different than the Bush-Cheney administration. For eight years they’ve protected the well-off.
It’s time for an Obama-Biden administration to help the rest of us.
Nelson Graves, Western Virginia director of the Virginia Minority Supplier Development Council, writes a weekly column for The News Virginian. E-mail him at .

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( mikmat ) on September 20, 2008 at 10:37 pm

I think we know what kind of change McCain is talking about: changes to the laws protecting the taxpayers from the greed of these carpetbaggers who fleece us, with the help of people like Senator Phil Gramm, McCain’s economic adviser. In 1980 Gramm sponsored, and pushed through a bill called the DIDMCA, which allowed the Savings and Loan industry to operate without government regulation. When the hornswogglers in that industry got in trouble from too many bad loans, the taxpayers had to bail them out in 1989, (thankyouverymuch George Bush Sr.), a $124.6 Billion soaking. One of the worst of the S&L;carpetbaggers was Charles Keating, of Keating S&L;, who did 5 years of jail time. McCain was one of the “Keating 5”, investigated because he took 9 trips paid for by Keating, flying on holidays on Keating’s jet, 3 times staying at Keating’s swank Bahamas retreat, the fun paid for by Keating, and accepting Keating’s $112,000 in “political contributions” money.  John McCain’s wife Cindy and father were the single largest investors in a $15 Million Keating shopping center in Arizona, possibly the reason why she refuses to disclose her personal finances, somethings need to be hid from the public?
Then 11 years later, the Same Senator Phil Gramm sponsors a bill, which passes, called The Commodity Futures Modernization Act. This bill allowed financial institutions to take debt like people’s mortgages, and sell, or “swap” them to other companies without any kind of government regulation! So after these companies make billions, the housing market collapses, and they come crying to the taxpayers to bail them out. (Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?) $85 Billion to bail out AIG, whose CEO just got a personal $47 Million severance package!), $5.3 Trillion to save private mortgage firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, whose CEO’s are supposed to receive $24 Million for the great job they have done.
Or changes like the “Enron Loophole’, written by , and stuck, in 2000, into The Commodity Futures Modernization Act, again by Senator Gramm, which allows over the counter of oil, energy trading, unregulated once again.  Not surprising oil speculation has us paying record prices at the pump, and the government’s experts have no idea why.  Remember Enron’s collapse, and the thousands of retiree’s who lost their retirement saving?  Senator Gramm’s wife Wendy made millions working for Enron.
No too difficult to guess what John McCain means when he talks about “change”.  One thing wouldn’t change, though-the patriotic cries of “Lookout for Terrorists”, distracting us while our pocket is being picked.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News Video
Entertainment
Offbeat & Weird

Advertisement